[1]张志田, 汪志雄, 郄凯, et al. 扭弯频率比对 π 型断面节段模型后颤振特性的影响 [J]. 振动工程学报, 2022, 34(6): 1268-75.
[2]董国朝, 许育升, 韩艳, et al. π 型加劲梁软颤振特性及下稳定板的影响研究 [J]. 振动工程学报, 2023, 35(6): 1395-403.
[3]ZHANG Z, WANG Z, ZENG J, et al. Experimental investigation of post-flutter properties of a suspension bridge with a π-shaped deck section [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2022, 112: 103592.
[4]SUN Y, LEI Y, LI M, et al. Flutter mitigation of a superlong-span suspension bridge with a double-deck truss girder through wind tunnel tests [J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2021, 27(13-14): 1584-94.
[5]LI M, SUN Y G, LEI Y F, et al. Experimental Study of the Nonlinear Torsional Flutter of a Long-Span Suspension Bridge with a Double-Deck Truss Girder [J]. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2021, 21(07): 2150102.
[6]LI K, HAN Y, CAI C S, et al. Experimental investigation on post-flutter characteristics of a typical steel-truss suspension bridge deck [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 216: 104724.
[7]张瑞林, 杨鸿波, 刘志文,等. 桁架加劲梁悬索桥后颤振特性节段模型试验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(05): 1-8+19.
[8]XU F Y, YANG J, ZHANG M J, et al. Experimental investigations on post-flutter performance of a bridge deck sectional model using a novel testing device [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 217: 104752.
[9]李加武, 洪光, 王俊, et al. 悬吊双层闭口箱梁桥面风振性能 [J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2022, 22(06): 207-19.
[10]YU E, JIN Y, XU G, et al. Aerodynamic stability of typical sea-crossing bridge with streamlined box girder under wave-interfered complex wind fields [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 228.
[11]WANG Z, ZHANG Z, QIE K. Experimental Investigation of Effects of Wind Yaw Angles and Turbulence on Postflutter Behaviors of a Suspension Bridge Model [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2022, 27(4).
[12]GUAN Q H, LIU L, GAO H, et al. Research on Soft Flutter of 420m-Span Pedestrian Suspension Bridge and Its Aerodynamic Measures [J]. Buildings, 2022, 12(8).
[13]GAO G Z, ZHU L D, LI J W, et al. Nonlinear post-flutter bifurcation of a typical twin-box bridge deck: Experiment and empirical modeling [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2022, 112: 103583.
[14]赵林, 胡传新, 周志勇,等. H型桥梁断面颤振后能量图谱 [J]. 中国科学:技术科学, 2021, 51(05): 505-16.
[15]HU C, ZHAO L, GE Y. Wind-Induced Instability Mechanism of Old Tacoma Narrows Bridge from Aerodynamic Work Perspective [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2022, 27(5).
[16]ZHANG W M, QIAN K R, GE Y J. Research on flutter-mode transition of a triple-tower suspension bridge based on structural nonlinearity [J]. Structures, 2021, 34: 787-803.
[17]ZHANG T, SUN Y, LEI Y, et al. Vortex-induced vibration of a flexible rectangular cylinder: Experimental investigation and comparative study of theoretical models [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 220: 104828.
[18]LIU J S, WANG F, YANG Y, et al. Nonlinear Flutter Analysis for a Long-Span Suspension Bridge [J]. Shock and Vibration, 2021, 2021: 5572429.
[19]WU B, SHEN H M, LIAO H L, et al. Insight into the intrinsic time-varying aerodynamic properties of a truss girder undergoing a flutter with subcritical Hopf bifurcation [J]. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 2022, 112: 106472.
[20]YUAN W, LAIMA S, CHEN W-L, et al. External excitation effects on the flutter characteristics of a 2-DOF rigid rectangular panel [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 209.
[21]NODA H, MITTAL R, SEO J-H, et al. Investigation of aerodynamic instability vibration of rectangular cylinder based on energy transfer [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 220: 104825.
[22]WANG X, XU F, ZHANG Z, et al. Self-Excited Forces Induced by Lateral Vibration of Bridge Decks [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2022, 27(11): 06022003.
[23]SKYVULSTAD H, ARGENTINI T, ZASSO A, et al. Nonlinear modelling of aerodynamic self-excited forces: An experimental study [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 209: 104491.
[24]LIU S, ZHAO L, FANG G, et al. Nonlinear aerodynamic characteristics and modeling of a quasi-flat plate at torsional vibration: effects of angle of attack and vibration amplitude [J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2022: 1-25.
[25]ZHANG R, LIU Z, WANG L, et al. A practical method for predicting post-flutter behavior of a rectangular section [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 216: 104707.
[26]汪志雄, 张志田, 吴长青, et al. π 型叠合梁颤振试验及数值研究 [J]. 振动工程学报, 2021, 34(2): 292-300.
[27]SKYVULSTAD H, PETERSEN ? W, ARGENTINI T, et al. The use of a Laguerrian expansion basis as Volterra kernels for the efficient modeling of nonlinear self-excited forces on bridge decks [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 219: 104805.
[28]BARNI N, ?ISETH O, MANNINI C. Time-variant self-excited force model based on 2D rational function approximation [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 211: 104523.
[29]WU Y, CHEN X, WANG Y. Identification of linear and nonlinear flutter derivatives of bridge decks by unscented Kalman filter approach from free vibration or stochastic buffeting response [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 214: 104650.
[30]WANG Z, ZHANG Z, WU C. Numerical investigation on the nonlinear flutter behaviors of a π-shaped sectional bridge deck [J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2022, 25(10): 2157-74.
[31]KAVRAKOV I, MCROBIE A, MORGENTHAL G. Data-driven aerodynamic analysis of structures using Gaussian Processes [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 222: 104911.
[32]WU B, LIAO H, SHEN H, et al. Multimode coupled nonlinear flutter analysis for long-span bridges by considering dependence of flutter derivatives on vibration amplitude [J]. Computers & Structures, 2022, 260: 106700.
[33]ZHANG M, XU F. Tuned mass damper for self-excited vibration control: Optimization involving nonlinear aeroelastic effect [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 220: 104836.
[34]WANG Y, CHEN X. Extraction of aerodynamic damping and prediction of vortex-induced vibration of bridge deck using CFD simulation of forced vibration [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 224: 104982.
[35]SUN H, ZHU L-D, ZHU Q, et al. Identification of parameters for same-order nonlinear damping terms in polynomial-type vortex-induced force models for bridge decks [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 229: 105158.
[36]HU C, ZHAO L, GE Y. Multiple-order vertical vortex-induced vibration mechanism of a typical streamlined closed-box girder [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 227: 105066.
[37]PAN J, TI Z, SONG Y, et al. An integrated approach of vortex-induced vibration for long-span bridge with inhomogeneous cross-sections [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 222: 104942.
[38]DUAN G, LAIMA S, CHEN W, et al. Effects of leading-edge separation on the vortex-induced vibration of an elongated bluff body [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 209: 104500.
[39]ZHANG Z, XU F, WANG X, et al. Instability modes of the flows around a streamlined box girder [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 225: 105008.
[40]祝志文, 石亚光, 颜爽. 带防撞栏杆扁平箱梁高阶模态涡激振动的 CFD 研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(10): 228-34,77.
[41]WANG Z, ZHANG Z. VIV properties of π-shaped bridge sectional model: dependence on torsional-bending frequency ratio [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2021, 26(6): 06021003.
[42]WANG B, ZHANG M, XU F. Experimental investigation on the vortex-induced vibration of a rectangular 4: 1 cylinder under skew winds [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 229: 105114.
[43]WANG C, WEN Q, ZHOU S, et al. Effects of end condition and aspect ratio on vortex-induced vibration of a 5: 1 rectangular cylinder [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2022, 109: 103480.
[44]刘庆宽, 任若松, 孙一飞, et al. 扁平流线型箱梁涡激振动雷诺数效应研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022.
[45]MA R, ZHOU Q, WANG P, et al. Effects of sinusoidal streamwise gust on the vortex-induced force on an oscillating 5: 1 rectangular cylinder [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 213: 104642.
[46]MA R, ZHOU Q, WANG P, et al. Numerical studies of unsteady flow field and aerodynamic forces on an oscillating 5: 1 rectangular cylinder in a sinusoidal streamwise flow [J]. Wind and Structures, 2022, 34(1): 91.
[47]BAI H, LI R, XU G, et al. Aerodynamic performance of Π-shaped composite deck cable-stayed bridges including VIV mitigation measures [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 208: 104451.
[48]龙俊贤, 周旭辉, 李前名, et al. 带高防护结构的边箱叠合梁斜拉桥涡振性能及抑振措施研究 [J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2021, 18(1): 119-27.
[49]刘志文, 肖晗, 王雷, et al. Π 型钢-混凝土结合梁断面涡激振动及气动控制措施 [J]. 湖南大学学报 (自然科学版) 中文版, 2022, 49(3): 68-78.
[50]董佳慧, 黄林, 王骑, et al. Π型钢-混叠合梁斜拉桥涡振性能及整流罩制振措施研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(16): 9.
[51]李加武, 党嘉敏, 吴拓, et al. 径向基神经网络用于钢-混 Π 型梁原始断面涡振性能的预测 [J]. 振动工程学报, 2022, 34(1): 1-8.
[52]LI J, WU P, HAO J, et al. Experimental and numerical studies on the two “lock-in” regions characteristic of vertical vortex-induced vibration of Π-shaped composite bridge deck [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 228: 105122.
[53]XIN D, ZHAN J, ZHANG H, et al. Control of vortex-induced vibration of a long-span bridge by inclined railings [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2021, 26(12): 04021093.
[54]YAN Y, YAGI T, NOGUCHI K, et al. Effects of handrail details on vortex-induced vibration for a Box-girder bridge [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2022, 27(3): 04021114.
[55]李春光, 王龙, 韩艳. 风屏障对流线型箱梁涡振性能影响机理试验研究 [J]. 湖南大学学报 (自然科学版) 中文版, 2021, 48(11): 12-21.
[56]黄林, 董佳慧, 王骑, et al. 外置纵向排水管对扁平钢箱梁涡振性能的影响及气动控制措施研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(13): 43-51.
[57]刘志文, 江智俊, 黎晓刚, et al. 流线型钢箱梁涡激振动机理与气动控制措施 [J]. 中国公路学报, 35(11): 133.
[58]DONG J, HUANG L, LIAO H, et al. Investigation on suppressing vortex-induced vibrations of the rectangular steel box girder for railway cable-stayed bridges by installing wind fairings [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 219: 104821.
[59]YANG Y, KIM S, HWANG Y, et al. Experimental study on suppression of vortex-induced vibration of bridge deck using vertical stabilizer plates [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 210: 104512.
[60]GE Y, ZHAO L, CAO J. Case study of vortex-induced vibration and mitigation mechanism for a long-span suspension bridge [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 220: 104866.
[61]CHEN X, MA C, XIAN R, et al. Effects of gap configuration on vortex-induced vibration of twin-box girder and countermeasure study [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 231: 105232.
[62]WANG C, HUA X, FENG Z, et al. Experimental investigation on vortex-induced vibrations of a triple-box girder with web modification [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 218: 104783.
[63]YANG F, ZHENG S, ZHOU Q, et al. Vortex-excited force evolutionary characteristics of split three-box girder bridges during vortex-induced vibration [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 218: 104762.
[64]LIU L, ZOU Y, HE X, et al. Experimental investigation on vortex-induced vibration of a long-span rail-cum-road bridge with twin separated parallel decks [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 228: 105086.
[65]董国朝, 许育升, 韩艳, et al. 双幅连续梁桥钢箱梁涡激振动机理分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022.
[66]周志勇, 马凯, 胡传新, et al. 水平和竖向间距对双矩形断面涡振性能的影响 [J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2021, 42(4): 505-13.
[67]XUE Z, HAN B, ZHANG H, et al. External suction-blowing method for controlling vortex-induced vibration of a bridge [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 215: 104661.
[68]CHEN G-B, CHEN W-L, YANG W-H, et al. Suppression of vortex-induced vibration of a box girder using active suction-jet slit [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 216: 104713.
[69]李春光, 毛禹, 颜虎斌, et al. 基于吸气的流线型箱梁涡振主动流动控制试验研究 [J]. 桥梁建设, 2022.
[70]ZHANG H, ZHANG H, XIN D, et al. Vortex-induced vibration control of a streamline box girder using the wake perturbation of horizontal axis micro-wind turbines [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2022, 108: 103444.
[71]DAI J, XU Z-D, GAI P-P, et al. Mitigation of vortex-induced vibration in bridges using semiactive tuned mass dampers [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2021, 26(6): 05021003.
[72]SUN L, SUN J, NAGARAJAIAH S, et al. Inerter dampers with linear hysteretic damping for cable vibration control [J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 247: 113069.
[73]XU K, DAI Q, BI K, et al. Multi-mode vortex-induced vibration control of long-span bridges by using distributed tuned mass damper inerters (DTMDIs) [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 224: 104970.
[74]CHEN L, LIU Z, NAGARAJAIAH S, et al. Vibration mitigation of long-span bridges with damped outriggers [J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 271: 114873.
[75]LIU Z, CHEN L, SUN L, et al. Multimode damping optimization of a long-span suspension bridge with damped outriggers for suppressing vortex-induced vibrations [J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 286: 115959.
[76]DI F, SUN L, CHEN L. Suppression of vortex-induced high-mode vibrations of a cable-damper system by an additional damper [J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 242: 112495.
[77]孙利民, 狄方殿, 陈林, et al. 斜拉索?双阻尼器系统多模态减振理论与试验研究 [J]. 同济大学学报 (自然科学版), 2021, 49(7): 975-85.
[78]孙利民, 狄方殿, 陈林, et al. 考虑垂度影响的拉索-双粘滞阻尼器系统振动分析 [J]. Engineering Mechanics/Gongcheng Lixue, 2022, 39(8).
[79]孙利民, 孙浚杰, 狄方殿, et al. 被动负刚度装置与线性滞回阻尼器组合对斜拉索 多模态振动的阻尼效果 [J]. 湖南大学学报 (自然科学版) 中文版, 2022, 49(5): 9-16.
[80]孙利民, 孙浚杰, 陈林. 黏性剪切阻尼器性能频率依存性对斜拉索多模态阻尼影响研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, (010): 041.
[81]刘志文, 沈静思, 陈政清, et al. 斜拉索涡激振动气动控制措施试验研究 [J]. 振动工程学报, 2021, 34(3): 441-51.
[82]井昊坤, 李寿英, 陈政清. 超长斜索三维气弹模型设计方法及其适应性研究 [J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2021.
[83]YANG C, CHEN Z, HUA X, et al. An explicit solution of modal-damping ratios for higher modes of a cable with an external damper [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 148(1): 06021007.
[84]LUO F, GAO C, ZHANG W. The key to suppress vortex-induced vibration: Stability of the structural mode [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2022, 113: 103692.
[85]LIM J, KIM S, KIM H-K. Using supervised learning techniques to automatically classify vortex-induced vibration in long-span bridges [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 221: 104904.
[86]ANDERSEN M S. Operational fluid modal analysis of full-scale pressure and wake flow measurements on the Gjemnessund Bridge [J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 249: 113295.
[87]赵会东, 陈良江, 肖海珠, et al. 高速铁路大跨度桥梁涡激振动振幅限值研究 [J]. 桥梁建设, 2022, 52(1): 7.
[88]ZHU J, XIONG Z, XIANG H, et al. Ride comfort evaluation of stochastic traffic flow crossing long-span suspension bridge experiencing vortex-induced vibration [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 219: 104794.
[89]SU Y, HUANG G, LIU R, et al. Efficient buffeting analysis under non-stationary winds and application to a mountain bridge [J]. Wind and Structures, 2021, 32(2): 89.
[90]WANG J, MA C, DRAGOMIRESCU E, et al. Two-dimensional aerodynamic admittance of a flat closed-box bridge [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2021, 147(3): 04020359.
[91]SHEN Z, LI J, LI R, et al. Nonuniform wind characteristics and buffeting response of a composite cable-stayed bridge in a trumpet-shaped mountain pass [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 217: 104730.
[92]LI Y, ZHU L, QIAN C, et al. The time-varying modal information of a cable-stayed bridge: some consideration for SHM [J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 235: 111835.
[93]CUI W, ZHAO L, GE Y. Non-Gaussian turbulence induced buffeting responses of long-span bridges [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2021, 26(8): 04021057.
[94]WANG Y, CHEN X, LI Y. Influence of Wind Turbulence on Aerodynamic Admittances of a Streamlined Bridge Deck at Different Angles of Attack [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2022, 27(9): 04022080.
[95]DIANA G, STOYANOFF S, ALLSOP A, et al. IABSE Task Group 3.1 Benchmark Results. Numerical Full Bridge Stability and Buffeting Simulations [J]. Structural Engineering International, 2022: 1-12.
[96]ALI K, KATSUCHI H, YAMADA H. Generalized framework for identification of indicial response functions from flutter derivatives of long-span bridges [J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 244: 112727.
[97]史明杰, 严磊, 何旭辉, et al. 基于节段同步测力的桁架梁二维气动导纳直接识别 [J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2021, 52(10): 3529-40.
[98]陈艾荣, 姜一凡, 张其玉, et al. 带吊机钢桥塔施工状态抖振响应及风振舒适性研究 [J]. 桥梁建设, 2021.
[99]赵林, 吴风英, 潘晶晶, et al. 强台风登陆过程大跨桥梁风特性特征及其抖振响应分析 [J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(4): 86-97.
[100]XIA J, LI K, GE Y. Wind tunnel testing and frequency domain buffeting analysis of a 5000 m suspension bridge [J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2021, 24(7): 1326-42.
[101]LI M, LI M, SUN Y. Effects of turbulence integral scale on the buffeting response of a long-span suspension bridge [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2021, 490: 115721.
[102]JIANG H, GE Y, LI K, et al. A novel nonlinear aerodynamic model of flutter and buffeting based on condensed DOFs technology [J]. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2021, 21(08): 2150112.
[103]SU Y, DI J, LI S, et al. Buffeting response prediction of long-span bridges based on different wind tunnel test techniques [J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(6): 3171.
[104]苏益, 狄谨, 李志国, et al. 基于节段模型测振试验的大跨度桥梁 抖振响应预测 [J]. Engineering Mechanics/Gongcheng Lixue, 2023, 40(6).
[105]WANG S-J, ZHANG W-M, TIAN Y-F, et al. Unified numerical model of wind-induced response of long-span structures: Aerostatic torsional divergence, flutter, and random buffeting; proceedings of the Structures, F, 2022 [C]. Elsevier.
[106]WANG H, XU Z, YANG M, et al. Numerical analysis on buffeting performance of a long-span four-tower suspension bridge using the FEM model [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2021, 25: 854-65.
[107]WU B, ZHOU J, LI S, et al. Combining active and passive wind tunnel tests to determine the aerodynamic admittances of a bridge girder [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 231: 105180.
[108]BARNI N, ?ISETH O A, MANNINI C. Buffeting response of a suspension bridge based on the 2D rational function approximation model for self-excited forces [J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 261: 114267.
[109]SU Y, DI J, ZUO T, et al. Buffeting response evaluation of slender linear structures considering the influence of the aspect ratio on the scale effect [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2022, 530: 116969.
[110]DA COSTA B M, WANG J, JAKOBSEN J B, et al. Bridge buffeting by skew winds: A revised theory [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 220: 104806.
[111]DA COSTA B M, WANG J, JAKOBSEN J B, et al. Bridge buffeting by skew winds: A quasi-steady case study [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 227: 105068.
[112]ZHAO K-Y, WANG H, TAO T-Y, et al. Parametric analysis on buffeting performance of a long-span high-speed railway suspension bridge [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(8): 2574-88.
[113]ZUO L, LI Q, MA C, et al. Analysis of Span-Directional Coherence Function and Buffeting Response of a Long-Span Natural Gas Pipeline Suspension Bridge under a Turbulent Wind Field [J]. Journal of Sensors, 2022, 2022.
[114]罗颖, 任达程, 韩艳, et al. 非高斯风场作用下桥梁抖振响应研究 [J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40: 1-10.
[115]王俊, 李加武, 王峰, et al. 简化 U 形峡谷风速分布及其对悬索桥抖振响应的影响 [J]. 吉林大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 1658-68.
[116]白桦, 王涵, 姬乃川, et al. 节段模型长宽比对风洞测力试验及计算分析的影响 [J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(8): 202.
[117]LEI S, CUI W, PATRUNO L, et al. Improved state augmentation method for buffeting analysis of structures subjected to non-stationary wind [J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 69: 103309.
[118]LI W, PATRUNO L, NIU H, et al. Aerodynamic admittance of a 6: 1 rectangular cylinder: a computational study on the role of turbulence intensity and integral length scale [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 218: 104738.
[119]ZHU S, LI Y, YANG Y, et al. Stochastic Buffeting Analysis of Uncertain Long-Span Bridge Deck with an Optimized Method [J]. Buildings, 2022, 12(5): 632.
[120]CHU X, CUI W, ZHAO L, et al. Life-cycle assessment of long-span bridge’s wind resistant performance considering multisource time-variant effects and uncertainties [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2022, 148(8): 04022092.
[121]CASTELLON D F, FENERCI A, ?ISETH O, et al. Investigations of the long-term extreme buffeting response of long-span bridges using importance sampling Monte Carlo simulations [J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 273: 114986.
[122]MONTOYA M C, NIETO F, HERN NDEZ S, et al. Optimization of bridges with short gap streamlined twin-box decks considering structural, flutter and buffeting performance [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 208: 104316.
[123]TRUONG Q-T, PHAN D-H. Numerical study of aeroelastic suppression using active control surfaces on a full-span suspension bridge; proceedings of the Structures, F, 2021 [C]. Elsevier.
[124]唐剑明, 谢旭. 横风作用下大跨度人行悬索桥振动使用性研究 [J]. 浙江大学学报 (工学版), 2021, 55(10): 1903-11.
[125]谢以顺, 王浩, 张寒, et al. 强风下高铁连续梁桥 最大双悬臂状态抖振时域分析 [J]. Journal of Southeast University/Dongnan Daxue Xuebao, 2021, 51(5).
[126]胡旭辉, 杨申云, 李郁林, et al. 组合梁斜拉桥施工最大单悬臂阶段抖振响应及减振研究 [J]. 桥梁建设, 2021, 51(1): 21-8.
[127]张寒, 王浩, 姚程渊, et al. 中央扣对大跨度三塔悬索桥抖振性能的影响 [J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2021, 42(3): 382-7.
[128]ZHANG Z, ZENG J, ZHU L, et al. Buffeting-induced resonances of Hangers at a long-span suspension bridge and mitigation countermeasure [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2021, 26(9): 04021064.
[129]MONTOYA M C, HERN NDEZ S, KAREEM A. Aero-structural optimization-based tailoring of bridge deck geometry [J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 270: 114067.
[130]王文熙, 杨志林, 华旭刚, et al. 摆式碰撞双重调谐质量阻尼器减振性能研究 [J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(7): 154.
[131]宋曰建. 高墩长联钢-混结合梁顶推施工期抖振响应及控制 [J]. 中外公路, 2022, 42(5): 8.
[132]LYSTAD T M, FENERCI A, ?ISETH O. Long-term extreme buffeting response of cable-supported bridges with uncertain turbulence parameters [J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 236: 112126.
[133]LIU P, ZHAO L, FANG G, et al. Explicit polynomial regression models of wind characteristics and structural effects on a long‐span bridge utilizing onsite monitoring data [J]. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2021, 28(5): e2705.
[134]LI S, LI S, LAIMA S, et al. Data‐driven modeling of bridge buffeting in the time domain using long short‐term memory network based on structural health monitoring [J]. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2021, 28(8): e2772.
[135]XU Z, DAI G, ZHANG L, et al. Effect of non-Gaussian turbulence on extreme buffeting response of a high-speed railway sea-crossing bridge [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 224: 104981.
[136]XU Z, DAI G, CHEN Y F, et al. Prediction of long-term extreme response due to non-Gaussian wind on a HSR cable-stayed bridge by a hybrid approach [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 231: 105217.
[137]ALI K. New mathematical formulation of nonlinear unsteady wind loads on long-span bridge decks under nonstationary winds using time-delay neural network [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2022, 148(10): 06022003.
[138]CASTELLON D F, FENERCI A, ?ISETH O. A comparative study of wind-induced dynamic response models of long-span bridges using artificial neural networks, support vector regression and buffeting theory [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 209: 104484.
[139]LIU C, GONG Y, JIANG Z, et al. Buffeting analysis of a suspension bridge under construction based on adjacent wind field data [J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 251: 113490.
全部回复(0 )
只看楼主 我来说两句抢沙发